Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal!


You are not connected. Please login or register

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Sun 06 Feb 2011, 07:20

MMEggman


Loading The Weapon
What's with the ignorant sons of bitches thinking Disturbed is Nu-Metal? If anybody bothered doing any sort of research whatsoever, they would find out that Disturbed doesn't really fit into any specific genre but that of their own. They best fit Hard Rock, they themselves have said this time and time again.
There's countless interviews in which the band clearly states that they have no idea why they have been labeled as Nu-Metal.

People who don't know their shit really piss me off when they say something wrong about Disturbed and then argue with me when I correct them. Some tiny dipshit on YouTube tried arguing with me but I shut him up with 2 large replies.

Seriously, does anybody else find this extremely annoying? I just wanna beat the shit out of these misinformed pieces of shit >_<

View user profile

2 Re: Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Sun 06 Feb 2011, 09:15

PoisonIvy


Haunted
yeah, i get very annoyed about that too

View user profile

3 Re: Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Sun 06 Feb 2011, 10:58

DarkHeartX9


Dehumanized
Actually, their first album can be called nu-metal. The rest fit into the hard rock area.

View user profile

4 Re: Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Sun 06 Feb 2011, 15:06

Animal-of-The-Night


Loading The Weapon
I think they began as Nu-Metal because they were starting off in the Nu-Metal age. After Believe, they diverged from that category and, as everyone knows, it is now hard to indentify their genre today because they've become so different from any of the common sounds while staying true to who they are.


I read a summary of them somewhere where they called Disturbed "Alternative Metal", which I think I like more than Hard Rock since they really aren't Hard Rock, but they aren't Heavy Metal. And since they still compete with the Hard Rock/Metal bands; compared to the others, Disturbed's almost an alternative sound (and alternative meaning different)... so the phrase Alternative Metal kinda makes sense.

Nobody get mad at me for that suggestion, but I personally thought it makes sense. Anybody else have thoughts of that?

View user profile

5 Re: Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Sun 06 Feb 2011, 19:39

Yumiyuri


Immortalized
Limp Bizkit is nu-metal...Disturbed isn't. For me, they're heavy metal AND hard rock. i dunno why, but it is for me.

View user profile

6 Re: Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Sun 06 Feb 2011, 20:15

MMEggman


Loading The Weapon
I get the alternative metal thing... But to me they've always just been Disturbed. Nothing else. I only say Hard Rock because David has said they best fit Hard Rock/Heavy Metal but I just personally identify them as "Disturbed", as if they created a whole league of their own.

Hard Rock is still a form of metal even though too many people think it's set aside from the rest of metal, which it isn't.

View user profile

7 Re: Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Mon 07 Feb 2011, 07:12

Yumiyuri


Immortalized
actually, metal and hard rock have the same roots xD

Disturbed should create their own genre lol xD

View user profile

8 Re: Disturbed is NOT Nu-Metal! on Tue 08 Feb 2011, 07:30

CrowX


Administrator
Well the Sickness is nu - Metal for sure but the rest of there albums are Hard Rock and that's what Disturbed is a Hard Rock Band.



[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


CrowX
Administrator
View user profile

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum

FacebookTwitterFacebookFacebook

 
  •  

Forumotion.com | © PunBB | Free forum support | Contact | Report an abuse | Free forum