DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why!


You are not connected. Please login or register

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

1 DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Mon 09 Mar 2009, 00:46

Morbid Spawn


One of The Ten Thousand
Why didint they get it
And Who the fuck is The Mars Volta...
soungs gross :roll:

View user profile

2 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Mon 09 Mar 2009, 14:00

CrowX


Administrator
Wow that is bullshit how they did 'nt get it but mars volta did wow.



[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


CrowX
Administrator
View user profile

3 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Mon 09 Mar 2009, 18:22

Joshy


Disturbed One
i downloaded that mars volta song to see why it did. i listened to that then inside the fire. honestly there is no comparison. obviously i am biast toward disturbed already but that mars volta song is pants! they must've been on osmething when they decided on the award

View user profile

4 Thanks on Mon 09 Mar 2009, 20:59

Morbid Spawn


One of The Ten Thousand
Joshy wrote:i downloaded that mars volta song to see why it did. i listened to that then inside the fire. honestly there is no comparison. obviously i am biast toward disturbed already but that mars volta song is pants! they must've been on osmething when they decided on the award

EXACTLY lol point proven

View user profile

5 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Tue 10 Mar 2009, 05:00

Stricken_Mistress


Inside The Fire
I completely agree that they got the shaft. But, I realized watching the Grammy's that Disturbed doesn't really fit into any of the genres. I mean, they're not really Hard Rock or Metal. So, they couldn't really win those categories.

View user profile

6 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Tue 17 Mar 2009, 22:54

DisturbedFan4Lyfe


Disturbed One
What was the song called? I didn't get to see it on the Grammies.

View user profile

7 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Wed 18 Mar 2009, 04:24

Stricken_Mistress


Inside The Fire
DisturbedFan4Lyfe wrote:What was the song called? I didn't get to see it on the Grammies.

Which song? The one that won or the one they got nominated for?

View user profile

8 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 19 Mar 2009, 10:16

Ravensclaw


Administrator
i dont care for these award shows there all rigged and not fair



[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


Ravensclaw
Administrator
The Pioneer All Things Disturbed Joke!
View user profile

9 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Fri 20 Mar 2009, 00:54

Mistress


Warrior
Ravensclaw wrote:i dont care for these award shows there all rigged and not fair

Here, here! Raven you are so right! who the fuck won? ......and they are who? we have to google them and download the song in order to decide whether or not it was more worthy? pfffffffffft!

View user profile

10 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Fri 20 Mar 2009, 01:32

DisturbedFan4Lyfe


Disturbed One
Stricken_Mistress wrote:
DisturbedFan4Lyfe wrote:What was the song called? I didn't get to see it on the Grammies.

Which song? The one that won or the one they got nominated for?

Inside the Fire was nominated, I know that. What was the Mars Volta song called?

View user profile

11 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Wed 15 Apr 2009, 02:49

Stricken_Mistress


Inside The Fire
DisturbedFan4Lyfe wrote:
Stricken_Mistress wrote:
DisturbedFan4Lyfe wrote:What was the song called? I didn't get to see it on the Grammies.

Which song? The one that won or the one they got nominated for?

Inside the Fire was nominated, I know that. What was the Mars Volta song called?

Sorry it took a while for me to respond.
The song was titled Wax Simulacra

View user profile

12 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 30 Apr 2009, 20:09

It doesnt matter, these days everything is baout politics, if u close ur eyes and sing stupid songs u r winner but once u open u eyes and tell what is really going on, the world which lead by demons will turn againts u even these stupid awards,

View user profile

13 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 30 Apr 2009, 20:10

Bowers


Immortalized
ur right i guess :D

i didnt think you would be allowed to listen to disturbed in iran

View user profile

14 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Sat 02 May 2009, 22:58

DYLANPCRIDDLE


One of The Ten Thousand
Disturbed should have won the Grammy, but the Mars Volta is a pretty good band. Don't mistake them for some talentless punk band that gets off of an image instead of music. Their style is one of a kind, but still not as good as Disturbed's.

But honestly, who cares. It's the grammy's, and it hasn't been taken seriously since the 1990's.

View user profile

15 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Sun 03 May 2009, 07:02

xxxDisturbedxxx


Loading The Weapon
Mars Volta won because of of their mainstreaminity (now there's a new word for the dictionary :]).

View user profile

16 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Sun 03 May 2009, 08:01

zealouso


Warrior
---



Last edited by zealouso on Wed 27 Apr 2016, 09:50; edited 1 time in total

View user profile

17 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Sun 07 Jun 2009, 04:08

TheOneYouForsaken


Loading The Weapon
this is the kind of shit that happens to disturbed all the time even though they have a shit load of fans they have just has many haters that obviously have more influence then the fans.

View user profile

18 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Sun 07 Jun 2009, 13:22

Zerstörer


Sickened
Mars Voltra may have paid the decision-maker... That sort of thing goes on alot in this business...

View user profile

19 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Tue 09 Jun 2009, 14:34

DYLANPCRIDDLE


One of The Ten Thousand
xxxDisturbedxxx wrote:Mars Volta won because of of their mainstreaminity (now there's a new word for the dictionary :]).

Um. I definetly wouldn't describe the Mars Volta as mainstream. They're really not all that popular. Most of their stuff is pretty abstract.

View user profile

20 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 11 Jun 2009, 01:43

I agree, I think everything is rigged anymore.

View user profile

21 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 11 Jun 2009, 02:35

Bowers


Immortalized
yh but if you see that kanye west has won more grammy's than pritty much all the metal bands combined you will see that the grammy's are biased towards rap,R&B,pop and country and only have two possible awards that disturbed could ever hope to win so its just a pointless award for rock and/or metal

View user profile

22 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 11 Jun 2009, 04:57

I agree,, and David once said too that metal doesn't get enough recognition. WTF? why not? not everyone listens to rap and country bullshit.

View user profile

23 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 11 Jun 2009, 13:01

DYLANPCRIDDLE


One of The Ten Thousand
There definetly should be a Hard Rock Awards show or a metal award show, so that ACTUAL MUSICIANS can win some awards. I'm sorry if i offended the producers of pop and rap music. You're real musicians, your frontmen and women are not.

View user profile

24 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Fri 12 Jun 2009, 01:53

Yes, hard rock awards i agree!!

View user profile

25 Re: DISTURBED = NO GRAMMY...but...Why! on Thu 02 Jul 2009, 10:52

S.M.F


Eye of the Storm
This is like when Jethro Tull beat Metallica for the first Heavy Metal Grammy. My mom is always asking me why disturbed or any other band I like have never won a grammy. And I say it's because theres like one freakin award. And she always responds with "Or it's because their not very good." And yes she listens to Pop music.

View user profile

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum

FacebookTwitterFacebookFacebook

 
  •  

Free forum | © PunBB | Free forum support | Contact | Report an abuse | Free forum